Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J. K. Rowling
This is the fourth book in the highly successful series, as nearly everyone on the planet knows. This is also the first novel in the series that I read before watching the related film (which is, at the time of writing, on my Netflix queue). Right from the beginning, I realized that it would do the story a disservice to see the abridged and altered form of the narrative; the sheer size of the novel demands first attention.
If “Prisoner of Azkaban” was a step away from the whimsy of childhood (a phrase I use often in discussing the first two books), then this is a massive leap towards the complications and trials of the teenage years. More than that, but after threatening to bring Voldemort back at least twice, the author finally makes it happen.
The means to that end is the most controversial element of the book: the Triwizard Tournament. This tournament is at the heart of Voldemort’s plan to restore himself to physical form, and as a plot device, it is a nice touch. Certainly there is a great deal of complication surrounding it, and within that complexity, there appears to be a rather obvious plot hole. In fact, the plot hole is so massive that it threatens to make the entire point of the Triwizard Tournament moot. The author tried to fix the problem, but it’s rather hard to ignore.
I thought of the plot hole, to be honest. In fact, I was struck at how closely the book resembled the Harry Potter version of a classic James Bond novel. Voldemort hatches inexplicably and unnecessarily complex evil plot, Harry survives that plot long enough to face down Voldemort, Voldemort binds Harry and then monologues for pages about his plans to date, and in the end, Harry manages (through courage and luck) to escape certain doom to fight again.
Frankly, it doesn’t matter. The brilliance of the tale is how quickly it turns from a relatively standard adventure involving a contest between wizards into a gloriously dark and shattering victory for Voldemort. Absolutely nothing is the same anymore after the final 100 pages, and one is left stunned by how well the author managed to build to that inevitable moment. I was most appreciative of how well the author incorporated tons of foreshadowing into the rest of the novel, masking it from the reader by focusing on Harry’s state of mind. Because he had other things on his mind, because he missed the signs and portents, the reader was equally fooled.
Most of those elements will resonate with young readers. Harry struggles with the darker side of popularity and celebrity, Ron struggles with his family’s fortunes (or lack thereof), and Hermione struggles with the realities that come with addressing societal wrongs. There’s also the emergence of strong romantic attraction and interest, which only adds to the potential for conflict between friends. One would expect all of these issues to continue into the future, since it is the most obvious source of resistance against the need to band together.
The author uses Rita Skeeter as an outside source of pressure, reflecting the tabloid media all too honestly in the process. But this is also utilized as a subtle influence on the Ministry of Magic. The Ministry has always carried a disturbing edge, but by the end of the novel, it becomes a telling vehicle for political criticisms.
The last 100 pages are an important turning point. While “Prisoner of Azkaban” brought heaps of darkness to the world of Hogwarts, much of this novel still leaves open the possibility of returning to a somewhat simpler life. The tournament is dangerous, but very reminiscent of earlier trials. That is simply not possible after the return of Voldemort. Now the series turns into a struggle to prepare and survive, even if it means fighting former allies in the process.
To achieve that end, Harry must set aside childish things and accept the mantle of adult responsibility. That alone makes the end of the novel more devastating; Harry’s innocence is shattered, and for some readers, it will be a similar experience. That is an important consideration; after reading this book, I am compelled to speak with my daughter about her reactions to the content.
I couldn’t help but draw a comparison to Tolkien in that respect. For my generation, we began with “The Hobbit” and quickly moved on to “The Lord of the Rings”, often in the later years of grade school. Those who grasped the meaning were changed by the experience; they had willingly endured some difficult and sobering lessons about life and death. Now that the Harry Potter series is complete, a new generation may very well find themselves going through the same process.
Is that a good thing? In this age of complete media saturation, it’s nearly impossible to shield our children from the ills of the world. We sometimes try to keep the most painful moments from them in the hopes that the light in their eyes won’t diminish even in the slightest, because as long as we see it reflected there, we can convince ourselves that the source is still within ourselves. Just as often, it blinds us to the fact that they’re already exposed to it, and they look to us to help them understand and cope.
So I can forgive the plot holes and the clutter along the way, because the author has given this generation a powerful gift. For my generation, Tolkien was something to be shared together, because most of our parents never read it. We had to absorb and consider its meaning on our own. Rowling may not have created a mythology to stand the test of time, but she has created a world accessible to child and parent alike, and a context for having the kinds of discussions that are all too often avoided.
Rating: 8/10
